Owner reduces bureaucracy to take property out of the refrigerator
Concessions
for renting a property faster range from allowing pets to unsecured contracts
The real
estate rental market had to reinvent
itself to turn the loss caused by the crisis in the sector into
profit. According to a survey by Secovi-SP (housing union), between June
2018 and May 2019 there was a 3.04% growth in the number of rents in São
Paulo. The warming, albeit in short steps, is an indication that landlords
are following what experts recommend to attract new tenants: reduce
bureaucracy. immobile
“Two things weigh a lot
when renting. The first one is the price negotiation itself and the second
thing is the guarantee for the owner. There is a mismatch between what the
consumer wants and what he finds in the market”, warns Débora Seabra, economist
at Grupo Zap, a rental platform.
There are numerous ways
to get a property out of the refrigerator after months of being out of service,
such as shorter contracts, flexibility in choosing the guarantor, replacement
of a legal person responsible for the security deposit and even authorization
for a pet in the rented property.
According to the
commercial director of real estate Lello, Roseli Hernandes, about two years
ago, pets gained the family member certificate in the market and became a
determining factor when choosing a property for a tenant.
“This subject became
frequent. Before that, our website didn't even inform if the property
accepted pets or not. Even condominiums have updated and abandoned these
restrictions. There has been a very big change in this
direction. Now, the owners are calmly accepting.”
tajarat properties
strives strives to be Pakistan's biggest real estate developer ever,
guaranteeing the highest international standards, prompt execution, and lifetime
customer loyalty. With projects like lahore smart city
housing society
For teacher Rosilda
Oliveira, who for eight years has been renting three apartments that she built
on top of her house, in Lapa, to supplement the family's income, pets are not a
problem. In the name of flexibility in times of crisis, Rosilda also bet
on offering contracts shorter than the traditional 30 months in the São Paulo
market.
“Some people are afraid
of not adapting to housing because it is on top of my house. That's why I
accept six-month or one-year contracts”, she says, who makes a direct contract
with the tenant, without the intermediation of real estate agents.
A shorter contract was
what university professor Juliana Kramer Soares asked for when she rented an
apartment in Chácara Inglesa, as she plans to change from tenant to owner.
According to Juliana, who
lives with her daughter, student Gabriela Soares, the real estate agency did
not budge and the contract had to be for 30 months. “But I asked for a
clause for exemption from fines after one year of leasing”, says
Juliana. Another facility she got was the replacement of the guarantor for
a security deposit . In her case,
R$5,100, equivalent to three months' rent.
Juliana's case is an
example of how the owners must make more flexible in current times in the name
of the contract, points out the marketing manager Brazil at Imovelweb, Angélica
Quintela. “The job market fluctuates a lot and people move more: from city
to neighborhood, because of mobility. Offering possibilities (of a minor
contract or exemption from fine) to the lessee ends up being a differential.”
Guarantor
gives way to other guarantees
A preferred type of
guarantee among owners, the guarantor has already been abolished in the
contracts of Uliving, a company focused on renting student
residences. “Our big difference in the lease is that we don't require a
guarantor. Contracts are signed electronically. We created a system
focused on our target audience – people who leave home to study. This
requires ease and speed”, explains Juliano Antunes, CEO of Uliving.
For the contract, only
the proof of income of the person who will bear the costs and the proof of
enrollment of the student are required. If there is a case of default,
Antunes says he has other strategies. "If there is a delay in the
payment of the monthly fee, the financial responsible will have to pay interest
and, if the amount is not paid, we can file an eviction action - which without
guarantor is much simpler to happen", he says, since the guarantor is the
person who is legally responsible for the property if the tenant is late in
paying.
Professor Rosilda
Oliveira also stopped demanding a guarantor to make her contracts more
flexible. “The person only makes me a security deposit of two rentals and
that's what's working for me,” she says.
According to a survey by
Lello in March, the guarantor corresponds to 52% of the owners' preference with
regard to the guarantee. Next, with 26%, is the security deposit, a more
practical modality. It is enough for the tenant to deposit an amount to
the owner (usually equivalent to two or three months' rent), which will serve
as a precaution for the owner to pay for any delays or damage to the
residence. At the end of the contract, the amount is refunded if no
repairs need to be made.
Third on the list of
guarantees preferred by landlords, with 17%, is surety bond. The amount
(usually equivalent to one month's rent) is deposited with an insurance
company, which will bear the expenses and lawsuits in case of default or misuse
of the property. Due to this administration, the value is lost to the
tenant: it does not return to him at the end of the contract.
Currently, according to
Lello, only 3% of owners opt for the guarantee exemption and another 2% have
other ways to ensure their guarantee – such as via credit card, an uncommon
modality, but which is still available in some real estate agencies in the market.
Comments
Post a Comment